The globalization of the NFL has been a major topic of
debate for many years now. In effort to
gain international attention, the NFL is eager for expansion outside of the US
for various reasons. While the NFL is a multibillion-dollar industry, the
expansion factor hopes to boost revenue and acquire a more international fan
base. The NFL is looking to expand into the London area, where the new Wembley
Stadium resides. Although this stadium is easily accessible, there are other
sporting events like rugby that the NFL would have to schedule around, which
proves to already present conflict.
For many reasons, I strongly disagree with the
aforementioned expansion of the NFL. The article London Calling by Bill Barnwell, speaks largely about the “NFL
targeting London franchise” (Barnwell, p1) However, in this article, the word
“unfair” struck my attention on numerous occasions. From scheduling around other sporting events and even different times zones, the coordination of game times seems like just that
alone would prove to be more troublesome then beneficial. Although London is
easily accessible for in that distinct vicinity, the overall fan base will not
sellout each game as the majority of fans can not afford to travel to London
for each home game. Not only will the time change affect the away teams
schedule, it will also play a factor in affecting players’ bodies. Many will
argue that eventually the profit of the expansion will outweigh the obstacles
of the process overall, but I beg to differ.
This globalization of the NFL has the potential to further
business, revenue, franchise and marketing internationally, but the cons are
much too unstable to further any possible thoughts of expansion.
Barnwell, B. London
Calling
I completely agree that the NFL expansion is a terrible idea. Not only will it affect the player's stamina, it is going to be a pain to watch a football game on a different time zone.
ReplyDelete-Wesley Morton